November 18, 2008

A QUANTUM OF ENTERTAINMENT

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jamie @ 1:01 pm

Casino Royale did so much to refurbish and rehabilitate James Bond, but A Quantum of Solace does not advance the effort nearly as much. Daniel Craig’s portrayal of Bond was a major element in the restoration, but it was really the character of Vesper Lynd, played by the wonderful Eva Green) that made the greatest difference. In Lynd, the film makers gave us a beautiful and intelligent woman whose growing attachment to Bond endowed his character with more depth and interest than he ever previously enjoyed. Unfortunately, there is no similar person in the new film, so what we get is Craig and Judi Dench and the splendid villian Mathieu Amalric and a lot of up-to-the-minute Hollywood mayhem. (Maybe too up-to-the-minute: I loved  Marc Forster’s The Kite Runner, but he overcuts his action sequences to the degree that you can’t follow the conflict, something that never happens with Paul Greenglass, the maestro of the last two Bourne movies and United 93.) Giving Bond some genuine emotional jeopardy in Casino Royale was significant, but right now, Bond is very much like Bourne, too much so; the challenge in the next Bond film will be to find a way to restore and reinterpret his typical wit and verve.

November 14, 2008

LOVE THAT BOB

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jamie @ 8:14 am

My pal Bob Love bought me sushi yesterday at a nice place near 46th and Park whose name has already galloped out of my head. He had good news that the yoga book on which he has been working for so long has been making good progress through the editing stages. It was great to see him, and to work with him on the Billy Crudup article he assigned me for Best Life. Hopefully we’ll be able to do something else again soon. Before lunch I saw my old Spy colleague Michael Hainey, now part of the ruling junta at GQ, who offered encouragement, and after lunch I had coffee at Osteria al Doge on West 44th Street with a new friend, Jon Kelly of Vanity Fair, with whom I’ve been having fun working on the Starring Five piece.

November 11, 2008

DOG DAY AFTERNOON

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jamie @ 1:42 pm

THE FRONT PAGE

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jamie @ 1:36 pm

The New York Times, November 5, 2008

November 6, 2008

WE’RE NUMBER 46944!

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jamie @ 10:39 pm

According to the site mongabay.com, the U.S. Bureau of the Census says MALANOWSKI ranks # 46944 in terms of the most common surnames in the United States for 2000. Out of a sample of 100,000 people in the United States, MALANOWSKI would occur an average of 0.16 times. The Census Bureau says that 95.07 percent were “Non-Hispanic White Only.” Another 2.58 percent were “Hispanic Origin.”

November 4, 2008

DECISION

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jamie @ 11:51 pm

“It’s been a long time coming, but tonight, because of what we did on this day, in this election, in this defining moment, change has come to America.”

THE CHOICE

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jamie @ 9:02 pm

Vote Number 400 in District 26 in the Town of Ossining, New York, on November 4, 2008, at approximately 2:30 PM.

STARTING ELECTION DAY WITH A BANG

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jamie @ 8:59 pm

Cara and I spent the morning with our friends Paul and Nadia Lindstrom shooting clays at the splendid facility at Orvis Sandanona in Milbrook. We had a lot of fun, especially Cara, who got to drive a golf cart.

UNFINISHED BUSINESS

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jamie @ 1:53 pm

In the days before the 1960 presidential election, John F. Kennedy appeared before an adoring, cheering throng at the old Boston Garden. “I do not run for the office of the Presidency after fourteen years in the Congress with any expectation that it is an empty or an easy job. I run for the Presidency because it is the center of action. And in a free society, the chief responsibility of the President is to set before the American people the unfinished business of our country.” As much as I admire John McCain, the choice is stark: this day, this moment, Barack Obama.

November 3, 2008

MORE ON “WHEN DISNEY RULED AMERICA”

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jamie @ 3:45 pm

The writer Lynn Phillips, who a few days ago requested a copy of the article “When Disney Ruled America” that I wrote for Spy, has written with her comments: “The article does indeed live up. Particularly once Eisner gets into power.The writing has an antic energy – a feeling of rushing faster and faster down the slope of its premise.And many of the details are still killah today – the selling of social distress as lucrative spectacle is particularly thrilling –Harlem theme park especially, yo, Dre, bro.

“I also like the ways the piece has proved prescient, but obliquely. Instead of the Harlem Disneyland we have single teen mothers from the Lohan and Palin families  re-packaging black teen “degeneracy” as clean, white, life-loving family responsibility.

“The piece is long by today’s rules, but it’s a relief to read a humor piece that hasn’t been geometrically shaped and smoothed out, New Yorkered into dull submission.  It reads as a TRIP, a process rather than some ZirconTM gem,  a thinking-one’s-way into the puzzle of being American in the era when entertainment became our most important export after weaponry. The delight and the horror.

“I like the squirminess of trying to find a place in a mass culture just as one is realizing that mass culture, pop culture, is becoming the ONLY culture and that there’s no place for what used to be called ‘the authentic self’ in it.  I like the way the satirist falls in love with his own absurd solutions to his society’s problems, gets a bit giddy with his own ingenuity. I think many of us have had the experience of imagining how to make America happy — a project soaked in both affection and contempt — then gotten excited when we thought we had succeeded, before realizing that we had created ourselves clear out of the picture.

“It’s interesting, too, the way your premise is evolving. . .I don’t think I’m the first to observe that Obama is in some ways a Disnification of 60’s radicalism – race and revolution with the danger taken out — the clean black guy with cute ears, black-but-not, like Mickey is a rodent-but-not. A guy who calls the working poor “The Middle Class” because they don’t like to be spoken of too accurately, who keeps his little red pants on, as it were, and handles us with white gloves. And he gives us HOPE. He inspires us. He cheers us up, sings “Mighty Mouse is on the waaay” with tax cuts! Health care! International respect! He’s not all crazy and torqued out with anger and self-rejection the way the 60’s kids like Jesse Jackson or John McCain were — and still are. And I like Mr. O. a lot. I work for his ascendancy. But his vision of America fills me with unease– a land that idolizes The American Dream of striving, sacrificing, moving up, working, working, working. It’s good, clean fun, but I’m not sure that to me Obamaland sounds like any kind of fun at all.”

I’d say somethig here, but it would probably sound stupid and ruin the afterglow. So I’ll just say Thanks, Lynn.

Next Page »

Powered by WordPress